|
PROPOSED CONSERVATION AREA FOR BOZEAT - the original consulation information following the public exibition with additional information below:
Alex Stevenson wrote: I wanted to take the opportunity to respond to some of the issues and concerns raised following the initial public exhibition in September 2009 which presented the proposed Conservation Area for Bozeat.
The proposed area is too large. The draft area proposed now omits the area between Bull Close and the Pitfield and the houses from The Orchard to Harrold Road.
Suggestions for additions. 3 Manor Close has been added in view of its historic association with Manor Farmhouse. However, the extra land behind the former Chequers PH has not been included as it has no apparent historic value. The old terraced houses in London Road are omitted as the conservation area runs out of character immediately south of (and including) Selby Gardens.
Suggestions for exclusion.
The houses in Church Farm Close and the bungalows in Church Walk need to be included or else there would be a hole in the Conservation Area. The idea is that the Conservation Area Appraisal identifies the buildings as “not reflecting the local vernacular” and indicates that opportunities would be sought in the future to improve the built form in redevelopment schemes as appropriate. The same rationale applies to the inclusion of the properties in Warners Hill.
Imposition of restrictions and general bureaucratic control.
The Borough Council wishes to see gradual improvements to the village through sensitive development and property alterations which reinforce its historic character and appearance. There is no way of achieving this other than by imposing controls and restrictions. Poor quality development should actually be unacceptable anywhere, whether a site is in a Conservation Area or not. It was suggested that the planning system as it stands ought to be sufficiently robust to prevent inappropriate development. It is demonstrable that this is not the case in the village and that, again, design/quality standards need to be imposed to avoid this in the future. One of the main benefits of Conservation Area designation is restrictions over demolition. At present any non-listed building can be demolished without requiring the Council’s consent, whereas designation allows the Council to negotiate the form of replacement buildings as a precursor to demolition.
The character of the village has already been destroyed.
It is accepted that the character of the village has been compromised by some modern insensitive development, but this is reversible. The historic street layout and built form in the central core is generally in a good standard of preservation. Conservation Area status would allow the Borough Council to insist on higher quality development schemes when negotiating with applicants/developers.
The village would be a target for development without a Conservation Area.
As much ammunition as possible is needed to combat mediocre/poor development and design, and to stop inappropriate demolition of the village’s historic fabric. Conservation Area status would clearly assist in these respects.
The revised draft of the Conservation Area Appraisal will be considered by the Borough Council’s Development Committee on 16th March 2010. Assuming that the proposal is approved, a formal consultation process involving all residents in the designation area will take place immediately.
Alex Stevenson Design and Conservation Officer Borough Council of Wellingborough
|